![]() ![]() They reveal what is beyond of the hearing aid performance showing the patient’s perceptions of the device use in everyday communication situations, social life return, self-esteem improvement and overall health. 1.278/MS of October 20, 1999, which Instituted programs of hearing devices (hearing aids) concession and public policies of cochlear implants. 3,762, of Octoand subsequently extended by Ordinance No. Hearing loss in their varying degrees affects thousands of people every year in Brazil. In response to this demand the Brazilian Ministry of Health developed a public health policy regulated by ordinance GM/MS No. Keywords : cochlear implantation, patient satisfaction, hearing loss, questionnaires, hearing tests Introduction However, the research shows that the positive effects tend to be superior in the first group. ![]() Regarding the activation time of the cochlear implant, the better positive effects tend to be for the binaural implant group (p = 0.08).Ĭonclusion: It is not possible to state that patients implanted with Neurelec ® Digisonic SP®Binaural have grater overall level of satisfaction than the ones implanted with the monaural. However, the statistical analysis comparing both groups showed a non-significant difference between them. Results: In overall score mark and two subscales binaural patients were more satisfied compared to monaural (positive effect, and services and cost). Methods: Patients implanted with NEURELEC ® (SP Digisonic ® Monaural and Binaural devices) brand from a Cochlear Implant Program of a tertiary hospital were evaluated concerning the clinical and demographic variables, pre and post-operative audio logical data and personal satisfaction with the use of the cochlear implant device. Objective:To evaluate and compare the satisfaction level of patients implanted with Neurelec Digisonic ® SP ® Monaural and Binaural cochlear implants devices. They reveal what is beyond the hearing aid performance showing the patient’s perceptions of the device use in everyday communication situations, social life return, self-esteem improvement and overall health. They reveal what is beyond the hearing aid performance. Introduction: Satisfaction questionnaires are efficient means to assess whether the device dispensed to the patient met their expectations and improved their quality of life. (2015) Satisfaction Evaluation between Digisonic Sp Monaural Vs Binaural. Received: | Published: September 15, 2015Ĭitation: Fernandes FL, Zago TM, Onuki LCB, Bonhin RG, Schuch LH, et al. Please type the correct Captcha word to see email ID.įernando Laffitte Fernandes, 1 Lucia Cristina Beltrame Onuki, 3 Rodrigo Gonzalez Bonhin, 1 Luiz Henrique Schuch, 2 Alexandre Caixeta Guimarães, 2 Guilherme Machado de Carvalho, 2 Arthur Menino Castilho 2ĢENT Otologist Doctor UNICAMP Audiology and Implantable Ear Prostheses UNICAMP, BrazilģAudiologist Cochlear Implant Specialist UNICAMP, BrazilĬorrespondence: Thiago Messias Zago, Otology, Audiology and Implantable Ear Prostheses, Ear, Nose, Throat and Head & Neck Surgery Department, PO BOX 6111, Postal Code: 13081-970, Campinas University, UNICAMP, São Paulo, Brazil, Tel +551935217523 Regret for the inconvenience: we are taking measures to prevent fraudulent form submissions by extractors and page crawlers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |